Olea

Olea v. Teichert Pipelines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20234:21-cv-03016California1,532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIAZAR OLEA, Case No. 21-cv-03016-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING TO STATE

v. COURT; DENYING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

TEICHERT PIPELINES, INC., PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 46, 47, 48,

12 On May 31, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of Article III standing. ECF No. 55. On June 30, Teichert filed a response to the order to show cause. ECF No. 56. The Court will remand the case to state court. I. BACKGROUND Teichert provides construction and repairs for natural gas pipelines throughout California. ECF No. 48-4 ¶ 3. On March 29, 2018, Teichert interviewed Olea for a position as a laborer and offered him the job. ECF No. 48-3 at 31-32, 34; ECF No. 50-1 at 10. The following day, Olea returned to Teichert’s office to review and complete employment forms, including a Consumer Disclosure and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.