Kleidman
Kleidman v. Murphy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER KLEIDMAN, Case No. 22-cv-06355-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION TO DEEM
v. PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
AND DENYING MOTION FOR
BERNIE MURPHY, et al., SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 57, 60, 69, 101
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff Peter Kleidman’s (“Plaintiff” or “Kleidman”) complaint, motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant, and motion for sanctions. Dkt. Nos. 57, 60, 69, 101. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss and motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant and DENIES the motion for sanctions. I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE In Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, the Ninth Circuit addressed the judicial notice rule and …