Cupp

Cupp v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20234:23-cv-01007California3,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 23-cv-01007-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: ECF No. 12, 28 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Defendant County of Sonoma’s (“County”) and Defendants’ Tennis Wick, Tyra Harrington, Mark Franceschi, Todd Hoffman, Jesse Cablk, and Andrew Smith’s (“Individual Defendants”) motions to dismiss. ECF Nos. 12, 28. The Court will grant the motions in part and deny them in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ronald Cupp lives at a property located in Santa Rosa, California. Cupp alleges the following incidents of warrantless searches by Sonoma County employees. The first incident occurred on February 15, 2019, when Defendant Andrew Smith, a County Code Enforcement Inspector, entered and took photographs of Cupp’s property without a warrant (“2019 Incident”). ECF No. 1 ¶ 32. The second incident occurred on March 27, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.