Beauford

Beauford v. McDonough

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20233:23-cv-02619California751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEITH W. BEAUFORD, Case No. 23-cv-02619-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE

TRANSFERRED

DENIS R. MCDONOUGH,

Defendant.

Self-represented Plaintiff Keith W. Beauford filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1 (“Compl.”), 3.] Plaintiff asserts a claim for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. against Denis R. McDonough, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). Compl. ¶ 3. Venue in Title VII cases is not set by the general venue statute, 28 U.SC. § 1391, but by the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5(f)(3). Johnson v. Payless Drug Stores Nw., Inc., 950 F.2d 586, 587 (9th Cir. 1991). Title VII authorizes suit “‘in any judicial district in the State in which the unlawful employment practice is alleged to have been committed’ as well as in the district …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.