Estate of Charles Chivrell v. City of Arcata

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20234:22-cv-00019California9,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ESTATE OF CHARLES CHIVRELL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00019-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART THE CITY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO

CITY OF ARCATA, et al., DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE A. C., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 68 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 22-cv-04804-HSG

CITY OF ARCATA, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

17

Before the Court are two motions to dismiss and a motion to strike in these related cases that arise from the same underlying fatal law enforcement encounter. The first motion is filed by Defendants City of Arcata, Arcata Police Department, APD Police Chief Brian Ahearn, APD Sergeant Brian Hoffman, APD officer Joseph Rodes, and APD officer Evan Beechel (collectively, the “City Defendants”). Dkt. No. 61. They move to dismiss the First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.