Flournoy

Flournoy v. Walmart Store, Pleasanton CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20233:22-cv-06057California3,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JAMES HENRY FLOURNOY, P00154293, Case No. 22-cv-06057-CRB (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

v. FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND

WALMART STORES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 14) Defendant(s).

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Marin County Jail (MCJ) facing state criminal charges in Marin County Superior Court and other county superior courts, and a frequent litigant in federal court, has filed a pro se First Amended Complaint (FAC) for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging various violations of his federal rights in connection with a January 15, 2019 arrest and prosecution for shoplifting at the Walmart store in Pleasanton, California. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.