Clifton

Clifton v. Central California Womens Facility Health Care

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20233:23-cv-00326California1,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL CLIFTON, Case No. 23-cv-00326-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS FACILITY HEALTH CARE, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Daniel Clifton, a former California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) prisoner, filed this civil rights action while he was incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF). ECF 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff’s non-prisoner application to proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) will be granted by separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), courts must sua sponte dismiss IFP complaints, or any portions thereof, which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim, or which seek damages from defendants who are immune. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Lopez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.