WalkMe Ltd., an Israeli company v. Whatfix, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20234:23-cv-03991California2,515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WALKME LTD., AN ISRAELI Case No. 23-cv-03991-JSW COMPANY, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING v. ORDER 10 WHATFIX, INC., A DELAWARE Re: Dkt. No. 39 CORPORATION, Defendant. 12 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) filed by Plaintiffs WalkMe Ltd. and WalkMe, Inc. (collectively “WalkMe”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it HEREBY DENIES WalkMe’s motion. BACKGROUND WalkMe was founded in 2011. (Compl. ¶ 11.) In 2012, it launched an “industry-leading Digital Adoption Platform (“DAP”)” and “actively takes steps to protect its proprietary DAP software.” (Declaration of Paul Senatori (“Senatori Decl.”), ¶¶ 3, 5.) For example, WalkMe’s contracts with customers include confidentiality and restricted use…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.