Peters

Peters v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20235:22-cv-06480California4,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DARREN MICHAEL PETERS, Case No. 22-cv-06480 EJD (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING

v. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden,

Respondent.

11 Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his state conviction. The Court found the petition, ECF No. 1, stated a cognizable claim which merited an answer from Respondent. ECF No. 8. Respondent filed an answer on the merits, ECF No. 15-1. Petitioner did not file a traverse although given ample time and opportunity to do so. For the reasons set forth below, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On or about February 14, 2018, the Napa County District Attorney charged Petitioner with twenty counts of making criminal threats (Cal. Penal Code § 422) and five counts of attempted criminal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.