Villasenor

Jackson v. Villasenor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20233:20-cv-08695California5,550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOUGLAS V. JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-08695-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

VILLASENOR, et al., Docket No. 33 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, Douglas Jackson complains about prison officials’ alleged retaliatory behavior and due process violations. The Defendants, Correctional Officers Luna and Villasenor, move for summary judgment. Docket No. 33 (“Summary Judgment Motion” or “MSJ”). Mr. Jackson opposes the motion. Docket No. 34 (“Opposition”). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. II. BACKGROUND A. Mr. Jackson’s Interactions with Defendants Mr. Jackson alleges that, on May 5, 2018, Defendant Villasenor asked Mr. Jackson where he was from and did not like Mr. Jackson’s answer. Docket No. 13 (“Second Amended …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.