Malberg

Malberg v. Nagle

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20235:22-cv-05027California1,768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARTIN MALBERG, Case No. 5:22-cv-05027-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

SHARON NAGLE, et al., Re: ECF No. 21 Defendants.

Plaintiff Martin Malberg brings this suit alleging First Amendment constitutional violations against Defendants Sharon Nagle, Jeffrey Vincent, Kymberly Speer, Rob Bonta, and the State of California, arising out of the motions to dismiss they had filed on behalf of defendants in another one of Plaintiff’s other actions. Defendants have all filed motions to dismiss the instant Complaint on multiple grounds. Based on the following, Defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND and WITH PREJUDICE. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed the first of several actions in federal court challenging the restraining order imposed on him by his ex-wife pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.