Abraham

Abraham v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20234:22-cv-01600California2,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LIOR ABRAHAM, Case No. 22-cv-01600-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE Re: ECF Nos. 30 &

COMPANY,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 30 & 34. The Court will deny Plaintiff Lior Abraham’s motion, and the Court will grant Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company’s (“State Farm”) motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lior Abraham purchased two insurance policies from State Farm: a Renters Policy for the policy period February 28, 2018 to February 28, 2019, and a Personal Liability Umbrella Policy for the policy period of March 11, 2018 to March 11, 2019 (collectively, “Policies”). ECF No. 32 ¶¶ 4-5; see ECF No. 32-1 & 32-2. On May 5, 2020, Abraham’s counsel sent a tender letter to State Farm for defense and indemnity under the Policies because Abraham had been accused of sexual assault. ECF No. 32-5. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.