Ames

Ames v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20234:23-cv-01080California1,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LINDA AMES, Case No. 23-cv-01080-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE

TRANSFERRED

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Self-represented Plaintiff Linda Ames filed a complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket No. 1-3.] The complaint alleges claims related to the 2013 foreclosure of property located in Vancouver, Washington against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”). Plaintiff avers the complaint satisfies the requirements of diversity jurisdiction because she resides in Washington, Wells Fargo’s principal place of business is in California, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Compl. ¶¶ 4-6. The court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) in which it took judicial notice of the fact that Plaintiff previously filed a complaint against Wells Fargo alleging similar claims related to the foreclosure and sale of the same real…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.