Reynolds

Reynolds v. EzriCare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20233:23-cv-01632California1,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MILTON REYNOLDS, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-01632-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

EZRICARE LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.

12 Milton and Danae Reynolds filed this products liability action in Alameda County Superior Court against Ezricare, LLC, EzriRx, LLC, Aru Pharma, Inc., Global Pharma Healthcare Private Limited, Amazon.com, Inc., and “Doe” Delivery Service Partner. Defendants removed the matter to the Court based on diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Court denied Plaintiffs’ previous motion to remand based on “Doe” Delivery Service Partner’s citizenship and ordered Amazon.com, Inc. to identify “Doe.” (Dkt. No. 56.) Amazon.com, Inc has since identified “Doe” as “To Be Delivered, LLC,” a company incorporated in California. (Dkt. No. 61-1 at 3.) Plaintiffs, who are California residents, now seek leave to amend to name “To Be Delivered” as a defendant. (Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.