Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BENJAMIN STIRRATT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., AMEND 13 Defendants.

Lead Plaintiff Boston Retirement System seeks a three-month extension of all case deadlines. It argues good cause exists for its extension request because of “Defendants’ belated productions and approach to discovery disputes.” Dkt. 313, at 3. Some of the discovery disputes to which Lead Plaintiff refers in its opening motion have since been resolved, including disputes over apex depositions,1 depositions from the Underwriter Defendants,2 and the possibility that the Uber Defendants will assert an advice of counsel defense.3 Nevertheless, Lead Plaintiff contends the apex deposition issue delayed other discovery and outstanding disputes before Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu over privilege logs, interrogatory responses, and deposition…