Katz-Lacabe

I. INTRODUCTION

16 On April 6, 2023, Defendant Oracle America, Inc.’s (“Oracle”) motion to dismiss 17 Plaintiffs’ initial complaint was granted in part and denied in part. See Order Granting in Part and 18 Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“4/6 Order”). Now, in their First Amended Class 19 Action Complaint (“FAC”), two individual Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against 20 Oracle, alleging the company violates internet users’ right to privacy as that right is enshrined 21 under the California Constitution and various state and federal privacy statutes. Defendant moves 22 to dismiss many of Plaintiffs’ claims under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to 23 state a claim or to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Plaintiffs also filed a motion to 24 seal portions of the Offline Access Request Response Reports (OARRRs). For the reasons that 25 follow, both the motion to dismiss and motion to seal are granted in part and denied in part. These 26 motions are suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the motion hearing set for October 27 5, 2023, is vacated. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). II. BACKGROUND1…