Matsko

Matsko v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20233:22-cv-05240California7,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 22-cv-05240-HSG

IN RE TESLA ADVANCED DRIVER

ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION, GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION Re: Dkt. Nos. 30,

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss, and Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. Dkt. Nos. 30, 42. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration; GRANTS the motion to dismiss; and DENIES the motion for preliminary injunction. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Brenda T. Broussard, Dominick Battiato, Christopher Mallow, Jazmin Imaguchi, and Thomas LoSavio initially filed this putative class action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.