Matsko
Matsko v. Tesla, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 22-cv-05240-HSG
IN RE TESLA ADVANCED DRIVER
ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION, GRANTING
MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION Re: Dkt. Nos. 30,
12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss, and Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. Dkt. Nos. 30, 42. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration; GRANTS the motion to dismiss; and DENIES the motion for preliminary injunction. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Brenda T. Broussard, Dominick Battiato, Christopher Mallow, Jazmin Imaguchi, and Thomas LoSavio initially filed this putative class action…