Fendelander

Fendelander v. Walt Disney Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20235:22-cv-07533California9,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHELLE FENDELANDER, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-07533-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS; TERMINATING AS MOOT

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 13,

Plaintiffs Michelle Fendelander, Ronda Lee Haines, Michael Hughes, John Manso, and Jasmine McCormick bring this antitrust putative class action lawsuit against Defendant The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) on behalf of all monthly subscribers of DirecTV Stream or its predecessors DirecTV Now, AT&T Now, and/or AT&T TV Now, from the period beginning April 1, 2019, through the present (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). Class Action Compl. (“CAC”), ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 1, 345. Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motions to dismiss at ECF No. 13 and stay discovery at ECF No. 43. The Court heard oral argument on Defendant’s motion to dismiss on …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.