Rose

Rose v. Facebook

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20233:23-cv-04128California3,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 LAURA A. ROSE, Case No. 23-cv-04128-PHK Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: MANDATORY

SCREENING OF COMPLAINT

FACEBOOK, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b) Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

13 The Court previously granted Ms. Rose’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. [Dkt. 6]. The Court now undertakes a determination of whether Ms. Rose’s complaint must be dismissed pursuant to the mandatory screening requirements of § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons set forth below, the Court does not dismiss Ms. Rose’s complaint. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to issue a summons and directs the Marshals to serve all relevant documents on Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”). 20 BACKGROUND On August 14, 2023, Ms. Laura Rose filed a civil complaint against Facebook. [Dkt. 1]. Ms. Rose avers jurisdiction according to the Stored…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.