Jones

Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20233:15-cv-02726California3,234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND

v. JUDGMENT AND/OR FOR LEAVE TO

FILE MOTION FOR

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER RECONSIDERATION CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 425 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Amanda Jones’ Motion to Amend Judgment and/or for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 425. Defendant Amtrak filed an Opposition (ECF No. 428), and Plaintiff did not file a Reply. Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court summarized the facts in its order granting Amtrak’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (the “Order”):

On August 25, 2014, Plaintiff, then a resident of Chicago, was in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.