Jones
Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND
v. JUDGMENT AND/OR FOR LEAVE TO
FILE MOTION FOR
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER RECONSIDERATION CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 425 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Amanda Jones’ Motion to Amend Judgment and/or for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 425. Defendant Amtrak filed an Opposition (ECF No. 428), and Plaintiff did not file a Reply. Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court summarized the facts in its order granting Amtrak’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (the “Order”):