Thomas
Thomas v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADRIENNE THOMAS, Case No. 23-cv-00065-JSW Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
? □ Re: Dkt. No. 27 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY,
Defendant.
E On September 5, 2023, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss, with leave to || amend by September 29, 2023. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has not filed an amended || complaint. Defendant asks the Court to dismiss this case with prejudice, citing Farr v. Pacific || Gas & Electric Co., No. 21-cv-8099-JSW, 2022 WL 2468461 (N.D. Cal. July 6, 2022). (See Dkt. i || No. 28.) The plaintiff in the Farr case was represented by counsel, and when the Court considers Z || the relevant factors, it concludes the less drastic sanction of dismissal without prejudice is || warranted in this case. See Yourish vy. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case without prejudice for failure to comply with ||…