Bold Limited v. Rocket Resume, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BOLD LIMITED, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01045-BLF (SVK)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. No. 114 ROCKET RESUME, INC., et al., Defendants.

Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Submission pursuant to which Plaintiff Bold Limited (“Bold”) seeks a protective order as to the location of depositions for three of its company- affiliated witnesses: Mr. Ortiz and Ms. Matthews (both of whom were designated as 30(b)6 witnesses by Plaintiffs); and Ms. Vanderham (noticed by Defendants). Dkt. 114. Defendants Rocket Resume, Inc. and Stephen Zimmerman (collectively, “Rocket”) noticed all three depositions in San Francisco and oppose Bold’s request. The Court has reviewed the relevant pleadings, the Joint Submission and relevant law and resolves this dispute without oral argument. L.R. 7-1(b). 19 The Parties dispute the timing of deposition notices, both formal and informal, and the 20 impact on their respective obligations as to these depositions. …