Mula
Mula v. Mula-Stouky
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 PAUL MULA, Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS CORRECTED
v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; AND
HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., DISMISSING ACTION Defendants. [Re: ECF 170]
13 Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr. (“Paul Jr.”) claims that two sets of defendants entered into two separate RICO1 conspiracies to deprive him of assets that his deceased grandmother, Sarah Marie Ogier (“Sarah”), left in trust for him. The corrected second amended complaint (“CSAC”) alleges that an “original conspiracy” was entered into by Sarah’s three children: Paul Mula, Sr. (“Paul Sr.”), now deceased, who was Paul Jr.’s father; Alan Mula (“Alan”), who is Paul Jr.’s uncle; and Helene Mula-Stouky (“Helene”), now conserved, who is Paul Jr.’s aunt. See CSAC ¶ 2. The alleged goal of the original conspiracy was to loot the trust…