Mula

Mula v. Mula-Stouky

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20235:21-cv-04540California10,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 PAUL MULA, Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS CORRECTED

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; AND

HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., DISMISSING ACTION Defendants. [Re: ECF 170]

13 Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr. (“Paul Jr.”) claims that two sets of defendants entered into two separate RICO1 conspiracies to deprive him of assets that his deceased grandmother, Sarah Marie Ogier (“Sarah”), left in trust for him. The corrected second amended complaint (“CSAC”) alleges that an “original conspiracy” was entered into by Sarah’s three children: Paul Mula, Sr. (“Paul Sr.”), now deceased, who was Paul Jr.’s father; Alan Mula (“Alan”), who is Paul Jr.’s uncle; and Helene Mula-Stouky (“Helene”), now conserved, who is Paul Jr.’s aunt. See CSAC ¶ 2. The alleged goal of the original conspiracy was to loot the trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.