Phelps Crowder v. Office of Personnel Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20233:23-cv-04412California2,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

13 On September 5, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff Briggett Phelps Crowder’s application 14 to proceed in forma pauperis and screened her original complaint, finding it deficient under 28 15 U.S.C. § 1915(e). ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has now filed a First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 7. 16 For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the amended complaint is still deficient. No later 17 than November 9, 2023, Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies 18 identified in this screening order. If Plaintiff fails to cure these deficiencies, the case will be 19 reassigned to a Unites States district judge with a recommendation for dismissal.

II. BACKGROUND

21 Although not entirely clear from the original complaint, it appeared that Plaintiff alleged 22 Solano County Superior Court Judge Shauna L. Chastain has prevented her from obtaining 23 benefits to which she is entitled under her husband’s (or former husband’s) federal employee 24 retirement plan. Plaintiff alleged: 25 In Her Attempt to delay stop and terminate my Long awaited Entitlement From a 8yr Back And Forth Dirty Game of A Judge who Forces…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.