Khan

Khan v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20233:23-cv-00816California3,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ABDUL KAREEM KHAN, Case No. 23-cv-00816-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

TWITTER, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendant.

12 On February 6, 2023, self-represented plaintiff Abdul Kareem Khan filed a complaint against Twitter, Inc with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 1. On July 2, 2023, Magistrate Judge Beeler issued a Screening Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissing the case with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 17. Plaintiff did not amend by the deadline, and because not all parties had agreed to have the case heard by a magistrate judge, Judge Beeler issued an order reassigning the case along with a report and recommendation that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff objected to the report and recommendation, and 19 the Court gave him another opportunity to amend his complaint to fix the deficiencies identified in 20 the Screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.