Jacquez

Jacquez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20234:22-cv-03718California2,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAFAELA JACQUEZ, Case No. 4:22-cv-03718-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 27 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, ROBERT FERGUSON, and DOES 1 to 100 Inclusive,

Defendant.

13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s causes of action for premises liability and negligence. See Dkt. No. 27. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are based on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff as the non-moving party. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986) (on a motion for summary judgment, “[t]he evidence of the nonmovant is to be believed, and all …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.