Carrasco

Carrasco v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20233:23-cv-03704California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SEIRA CARRASCO, Case No. 23-cv-03704-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO ADD A DEFENDANT

AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COURT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add/substitute a defendant and motion to remand back to state court. Dkt. No. 10. Defendants oppose. Dkt. No. 11. For the reasons discussed at the October 13, 2023 hearing and below, the Court GRANTS the motion and REMANDS the case back to the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. 17 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Carraso filed her original complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo on July 5, 2023 against Costco and Doe defendants 1 through 10, alleged to be agents or employees of named defendant. Dkt. No. 1-2. The complaint asserts causes of action for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.