Day

Day v. GEICO Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20235:21-cv-02103California712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESSICA DAY, Case No. 21-cv-02103-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

v. CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., SEALED Defendants. Re: ECF No. 183

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s 13 Material Should Be Sealed (the “Motion”), filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f). ECF No. 14 183. The Motion concerns (1) an exhibit submitted in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to 15 GEICO’s Motion to Reconsider Abstention of Jurisdiction that GEICO had previously designated 16 as confidential, and (2) a reference in Plaintiff’s opposition brief to the contents of that exhibit. 17 See id. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

19 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 20 and documents, including judicial records…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.