Yeh

Yeh v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20233:23-cv-01704California5,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HENRY YEH, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01704-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

TESLA, INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 38 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Henry Yeh and his one-year-old son, G.Y., bring this putative class action against Tesla, Inc.(“Tesla”) asserting common law and statutory claims related to Tesla’s alleged failure to protect their privacy in connection with video footage captured by cameras in their Tesla vehicle. Presently before the Court is Tesla’s Motion to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiffs’ Claims on an Individual Basis and to Dismiss the Action (“Motion” or “Motion to Compel”). The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the hearing set for October 20, 2023 pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.1 II. BACKGROUND A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.