Day

Day v. GEICO Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20235:21-cv-02103California1,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESSICA DAY, Case No. 21-cv-02103-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING GEICO’S MOTION

v. TO RECONSIDER ABSTENTION OF

JURISDICTION

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF No. 180 Defendants.

12 Presently before the Court is Defendants GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, and GEICO General Insurance Company’s (together, “GEICO” or “Defendants”) Motion to Reconsider Abstention of Jurisdiction (the “Motion”). See Mot., ECF No. 180. GEICO seeks reconsideration of the Court’s order declining to abstain from exercising its jurisdiction in this action. See Order re Abstention, ECF No. 130. Plaintiff Jessica Day (“Plaintiff”) opposes the Motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 184. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND In April 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Defendants announced the GEICO Giveback program, which provided a 15% discount on new and renewed insurance policies. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.