Hsu

Hsu v. Zeisler

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20233:23-cv-02866California1,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FREDERICK W. HSU, Case No. 3:23-cv-02866-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ ANTI-

v. SLAPP MOTION AND MOTION TO

DISMISS

AARON M. ZEISLER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

12 Frederick Hsu brings a breach of contract claim against Winslow Strong, Brian Burns, and Aaron Zeisler based on an alleged breach of a stipulated confidentiality order entered by an arbitration panel. Mr. Burns and Mr. Zeisler are attorneys who represented Mr. Strong in the arbitration proceedings and continue to represent him in a petition seeking confirmation of the arbitration award. Defendants’ motion pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 and motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 16.1) Having considered the parties briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on October 5, 2023, the Court DENIES the motion for the reasons stated at the hearing and as explained below. Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.