Turner

Turner v. Rimon Law

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20233:23-cv-04062California3,520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 TERRANCE TURNER, Case No. 23-cv-04062-PHK Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: MANDATORY

SCREENING OF COMPLAINT

RIMON LAW, et al., PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b) Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

17 18 19 The Court previously granted Plaintiff Turner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. [Dkt. 6]. The Court now undertakes a determination of whether the complaint [Dkt. 1] must be dismissed pursuant to the mandatory screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). After reviewing the complaint and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the complaint pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court ORDERS that the DEADLINE for Plaintiff Turner to file an amended complaint is Monday, November 13, 2023 (that is, thirty (30) days from the date of this Order). Because this is a pro se action, the Court provides NOTICE that if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.