Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04948-JSW

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' v. FOURTH MOTION FOR SERVICE BY

ALTERNATE MEANS AND

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT

HUMAN SERVICES, et al., BRIAN HERNANDEZ Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 53

13 Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ fourth motion for service by alternate means. (Dkt. No. 53.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs have submitted a facially insufficient motion for the fourth time. The Court thus endeavors to make the requirements for a motion—and the reasons Plaintiffs’ motion once again falls short—as clear as possible. The Court assumes familiarity with its previous orders. (See Dkt. Nos. 46, 48, 50.) A. Plaintiffs Did Not Demonstrate Reasonable Diligence in Attempting to Locate and Serve Defendant Hernandez. 21 In…