Olson

Olson v. Alameda County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20231:23-cv-04219California220 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OLSON, Case No. 23-cv-04219-RMI Petitioner,

ORDER OF TRANSFER

v. , Respondent. 11 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a prisoner. Petitioner challenges a conviction obtained || in the Amador County Superior Court. Amador County is in the venue of the United States 14 || District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is also incarcerated in the Eastern |} District. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of || conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). This district is neither. Petitions challenging a conviction are || preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); see also Laue v. Nelson, || 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Because Petitioner was convicted in the Eastern District, and because he is also being held in that district, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.