Turner
Turner v. Valor Merchant Services Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 TERRANCE TURNER, Plaintiff, No. C 23-03381 WHA Vv.
II || VALOR MERCHANT SERVICES ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
COMPANY, RECOMMENDATION
Defendant.
The undersigned has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero and agrees that this action should be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee (Dkt. No. 8). In other words, plaintiff has failed to prosecute his case. No objection was received in response to the report. The report contains one inaccuracy in stating that plaintiff has not consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge when he has (Dkt. No. 5). Nevertheless, because defendant has not done so, reassignment of this action was proper. See Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017). This order ADOPTS IN FULL the report and recommendations of Judge Spero with the foregoing correction. For the reasons stated…