Ibarra

Ibarra v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20233:23-cv-01037California5,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Factual Allegations

21 Plaintiff Nicolas Ibarra, who is represented by counsel, is an individual with acute and 22 chronic schizophrenia. Dkt. No. 25, TAC at 2. Plaintiff attaches to the TAC two prior 23 administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decisions, among other documents. Based on the allegations and 24 the exhibits, it appears that on January 10, 2020, an ALJ found plaintiff eligible for Supplemental

26 1 The Court does not refer to paragraph numbers in the Third Amended Complaint, as many of the paragraph numbers are out of order and several numbers are repeated throughout the 27 complaint. Unless otherwise indicated, citations to exhibits are to the ECF-stamped page numbers Security Income (“SSI”) benefits as of September 19, 2017. Dkt No. 25-2 at 6. After that eligibility determination but before he began receiving benefits, plaintiff reported to the agency that he owned land in Mexico. Id. at 8. It appears that he did so in a “Statement of Income and Resources” and in an agency interview. See id. On March 9, 2020, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) issued a notice indicating plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.