Santos

Santos v. County of Humboldt

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20231:22-cv-07485California6,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 STEVEN A. SANTOS, Case No. 22-cv-07485-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. THE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.

13 Now pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (dkt. 26). Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 27) and Defendant has filed a reply (dkt. 28). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil L.R. 7-1(b), the court finds that the matter is suitable for disposition on the papers, and that oral argument would not aid the decisional process. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion is granted. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff filed an original complaint in November of 2022 (dkt. 1) which was followed by Defendant’s first dismissal motion (dkt. 8). In lieu of responding, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.