LeGrand

LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20233:22-cv-05815California3,814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CONDALISA LEGRAND, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO RETAIN

v. CONFIDENTIALITY

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 66 Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Abbott Laboratories’ Motion to Retain Confidentiality, in which Abbott moves to retain the confidentiality of certain documents produced in the course of litigation. ECF No. 66. Plaintiff Condalisa LeGrand filed an opposition (ECF No. 72) and Abbott filed a reply (ECF No. 74). The Court has reviewed each of the disputed documents in camera and finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Abbott’s Motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.