Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20234:23-cv-01196California3,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANGLE INC., Case No. 23-cv-01196-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ARITZIA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court is Defendants Aritzia, Inc., Aritzia LP, and Unites States of Aritzia, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Renewed Motion to Dismiss. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, the record in this case, and oral argument. For the following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion and DISMISSES Plaintiff Tangle Inc.’s (“Tangle”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. BACKGROUND Tangle is a toy manufacturer and distributor incorporated in California. (SAC ¶¶ 16, 17.) Tangle holds copyrights for nine sculptural works which Tangle alleges were infringed by Defendants. (SAC ¶ 16.) Each of Tangle’s registered works is a kinetic sculpture made of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.