Biesenbach

Biesenbach v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20234:23-cv-03423California1,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KLAUS BIESENBACH, Case No. 23-cv-03423-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Self-represented Plaintiff Klaus Biesenbach filed this action in San Francisco County Superior Court against Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, and Adult Protective Services (“City Defendants”), San Francisco Housing Authority, and Pilsner Inn. [Docket No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”).] City Defendants removed based on federal jurisdiction. [Docket No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”).] Plaintiff now moves to remand the case to state court. [Docket Nos. 6 (“Mot.”), 16 (“Reply”).] City Defendants oppose remand. [Docket No. 15 (“Opp’n”).] This matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND On June 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed his complaint in state court alleging negligence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.