LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C v. LegalForce, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20233:22-cv-03724California8,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C, Case No. 22-cv-03724-TLT Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

v. MOTION TO DISMISS LEGALFORCE, INC., Re: ECF No. 95 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. asserts four causes of action against Defendant LegalForce, Inc. in relation to Plaintiff’s trademarks: (1) trademark infringement under the Lanham Act via (a) 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and (b) 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (2) cybersquatting under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d); and (3) trademark infringement under California common law. See ECF No. 93 (“SAC”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. See ECF No. 95 (“Mot.”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, oral argument on October 3, 2023, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is a California S corporation that operates two legal services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.