Iseli

Iseli v. All of the ALEG

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20235:22-cv-06140California1,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, Case No. 22-cv-06140-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH PREJUDICE

ALL OF THE ALEG, Defendant.

12 Branden Iseli filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. The Court reviewed the initial complaint and dismissed it with instructions on how to amend. Dkt. No. 16 (“Screening Order”). Mr. Iseli thereafter filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Dkt. Nos. 18, 19. The Court reviews the FAC and SAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This action is DISMISSED because Mr. Iseli did not comply with the Court’s instructions and because the FAC and SAC do not state a cognizable claim for relief. I. Legal Standard Federal courts must screen any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims and dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.