Pinn

Pinn v. Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20234:22-cv-04048California3,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY PINN, Case No. 22-cv-04048-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION AND MOTION TO

DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 65 11 Defendants. 12 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Kelly Pinn challenges Defendants’ alleged practice of making unsolicited telemarketing phone calls to individuals who have registered their phone numbers on the national Do Not Call registry. Defendants are Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation, Inc. (“CCCF”); National Budget Planners of South Florida, Inc. (“NBP”); Ishwinder Judge, an individual; and Digital Media Solutions, LLC (“DMS”). CCCF filed a third-party complaint against DMS. [Docket No. 43.] DMS now moves to compel arbitration as to CCCF, or in the alternative, to dismiss the third-party complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). This matter is suitable for determination without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.