Standley
Standley v. Clifton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAMERON STANDLEY, Case No. 23-cv-00509-PCP Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
v: PREJUDICE JUSTIN CLIFTON, et al., Defendants. L
On June 30, 2023, the Court dismissed the original complaint because it failed to state a || cognizable claim for relief. Dkt. No. 9. The Court granted leave to amend. See id. Upon request, || the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time to file his amended complaint and informed him a || that “[flailure to file an amended complaint in the time provided wi// result in dismissal of this
|| action without further notice to Plaintiff.” Dkt. No. 11 (emphasis added). The amended complaint Z was due September 15, 2023, see id., but has not been filed, see generally, Dkt. Because Plaintiff failed to amend despite opportunity and a warning of the consequences, || this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. See Harris v. Mangum, 863 F.3d 1133, 1141-42…