Pinn
Pinn v. Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY PINN, Case No. 22-cv-04048-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON DMS’S MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING Re: Dkt. No. 66 FOUNDATION, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Kelly Pinn challenges Defendants’ alleged practice of making unsolicited telemarketing phone calls to individuals who have registered their phone numbers on the national Do Not Call registry. Defendants are Digital Media Solutions, LLC (“DMS”); Consumer Credit Counseling Foundation, Inc. (“CCCF”); National Budget Planners of South Florida, Inc. (“NBP”); and Ishwinder Judge, an individual. DMS now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [Docket No. 66.] Pinn moves to continue the motion to dismiss to allow her to complete jurisdictional discovery and the parties filed a joint…