Kamath
Kamath v. PayPal, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 RESHMA KAMATH, Case No.23-cv-03636-NC 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
PAYPAL, INC., JURISDICTION; CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT Defendant. CONFERENCE 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 8, 9 10 Plaintiff Reshma Kamath filed a complaint against Defendants on July 21, 2023. ECF 1. Kamath alleges that the Court has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as well as jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Id. at ¶ 6. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and are presumptively without jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). District courts have subject matter jurisdiction through federal question or diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. District courts also have jurisdiction over claims…