Raynaldo

Raynaldo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20234:21-cv-05808California4,783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONALD RAYNALDO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05808-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Re: Dkt. No. 79 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s (“Honda”) motion to dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SACAC”). Plaintiffs1 filed the SACAC on November 17, 2022. See Dkt. No. 78. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs bring numerous claims against Honda in the SACAC. Plaintiffs allege that Honda CR-Vs (model years 2017-2019) and Honda Accords (model years 2016-2019) (“Class Vehicles”) have a common defect that causes parasitic draining. In its September 20, 2022 Order Granting Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.