Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20233:23-cv-02110California3,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON, Case No. 23-cv-02110-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. No. 11. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND On May 1, 2023, pro se Plaintiff James Johnson filed this action against the City and County of San Francisco. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). The factual background to Mr. Johnson’s claims is less than clear, but appears to revolve around a series of attacks he allegedly sustained while sleeping in his home, the interactions he had with the police and the Veterans Administration (“VA”) in connection with these attacks, and the purportedly wrongful towing of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.