Drevaleva

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 19-cv-01454-HSG

DREVALEVA,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, VACATE JUDGMENT 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 92 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 11 Defendants. Case No. 19-cv-2665-HSG

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA

DREVALEVA, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 101 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

18 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s related motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to 19 vacate the judgments long ago entered in favor of Defendants. Each motion is the third motion to 20 vacate that Plaintiff has filed in these cases. Rule 60(b) “provides an ‘exception to finality’ that 21 ‘allows a party to seek relief from a final judgment, and request reopening of [her] case, under a 22 limited set of circumstances.’” United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260, 269, 130 23…