Oyster Optics, LLC v. Ciena Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20234:17-cv-05920California3,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OYSTER OPTICS, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-05920-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE:

v. ENABLEMENT AND WRITTEN

DESCRIPTION AND RELATED

CIENA CORPORATION, PORTIONS OF MOTIONS TO STRIKE

TESTIMONY OF DR. GEORGE PAPEN

Defendant. AND DR. KEITH GOOSEN

Re: Dkt. Nos. 177-4 (178), 181, 184-3 (182), 186-2 (185)1

14 This is the second in a series of Orders addressing the parties’ motions for summary 15 judgment and related Daubert motions. This Order addresses (1) the parties’ cross-motions for 16 summary judgment on Defendant Ciena Corporation’s (“Ciena”) affirmative defense of invalidity 17 for lack of enablement; and (2) Plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC’s (“Oyster”) motion for summary 18 judgment on Ciena’s affirmative defense of invalidity for lack of written description. In 19 connection with those motions, Oyster’s moves to strike the testimony and opinions of Ciena’s 20 expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.