Oyster Optics, LLC v. Ciena Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OYSTER OPTICS, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-05920-JSW
Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE:
v. ENABLEMENT AND WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AND RELATED
CIENA CORPORATION, PORTIONS OF MOTIONS TO STRIKE
TESTIMONY OF DR. GEORGE PAPEN
Defendant. AND DR. KEITH GOOSEN
Re: Dkt. Nos. 177-4 (178), 181, 184-3 (182), 186-2 (185)1
14 This is the second in a series of Orders addressing the parties’ motions for summary 15 judgment and related Daubert motions. This Order addresses (1) the parties’ cross-motions for 16 summary judgment on Defendant Ciena Corporation’s (“Ciena”) affirmative defense of invalidity 17 for lack of enablement; and (2) Plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC’s (“Oyster”) motion for summary 18 judgment on Ciena’s affirmative defense of invalidity for lack of written description. In 19 connection with those motions, Oyster’s moves to strike the testimony and opinions of Ciena’s 20 expert…